Programs, Courses and Student Affairs

200.010 Standard of Conduct

kuscheld — Thu, 27 May 2010 16:08:00 +0000

200.010 Standard of Conduct kuscheld Thu, 05/27/2010 - 16:08

Amended Bd. Min. 3-20-81; Bd. Min. 8-3-90, Bd. Min 5-19-94; Bd. Min. 5-24-01, Bd. Min. 7-27-12; Bd. Min. 12-7-12; Bd. Min. 6-19-14; Revised 9-22-14 by Executive Order 41; Revised 11-3-15 by Executive Order 41; Amended 2-9-17; Bd. Min. 9-24-20; Bd. Min. 11-19-20; Amended 6-29-23; Amended 9-7-23.

The Standard of Conduct exists to support the mission of the ��ϲʹ�� as an educational institution. The following expectations have been established in order to protect a specialized educational environment conducive to learning which fosters integrity, academic success, personal and professional growth, and responsible citizenship.

A student at the University assumes an obligation to behave in a manner compatible with the University's function as an educational institution and voluntarily enters into a community of high achieving scholars. A student organization recognized by the ��ϲʹ�� also assumes an obligation to behave in a manner compatible with the University's function as an educational institution. Consequently, students and student organizations must adhere to community standards in accordance with the University’s mission and expectations. Students and student organizations are expected to demonstrate responsibility for their actions; respect the rights and property of others; and observe federal, state, and local laws, as well as University rules and policies.

The Standard of Conduct is implemented through Section 200.020 Rules of Procedures in Student or Student Organization Conduct Matters. It is to be implemented and interpreted in a manner that supports the University’s mission as an educational institution and protects the University’s educational environment.

Jurisdiction of the ��ϲʹ�� generally shall be limited to conduct which occurs on the ��ϲʹ�� premises or at University-sponsored or University- supervised functions. However, the University may take appropriate action, including, but not limited to the imposition of sanctions under Section 200.020 and Chapter 600 of the Collected Rules and Regulations against students and student organizations for conduct occurring in other settings, including off campus, for the following purposes: (1) in order to protect the health, safety, welfare, and well-being of students, employees, and other members of the University community, or (2) if there are effects of the conduct that materially interfere with or limit any person’s or entity’s ability to participate in or benefit from the University's educational programs, activities, or employment. Jurisdiction of conduct occurring in other settings, including off campus, may be exercised at the discretion of the University for these stated purposes, but shall not be exercised in any way that would interfere with a student’s protected constitutional rights.
A student organization is a recognized student organization which has received official approval in accordance with Section 250.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations. Action against student organizations under the Standard of Conduct and Rules of Procedure may be separate from action taken against individual members. A student organization will be considered responsible for conduct outlined in Section 200.010.C only when there are circumstances indicating that the organization should bear collective responsibility for the conduct, and not solely because its individual members engaged in prohibited conduct. To determine whether a student organization is responsible for conduct outlined in Section 200.010.C and the extent to which it should be sanctioned, all relevant circumstances will be considered, including but not limited to the following:
1. Factors weighing in favor of organizational responsibility:
  1. The student organization, through its officers or practices or customs, by any means approved, condoned, allowed, encouraged, assisted or promoted such prohibited conduct;
  2. The prohibited conduct was committed, permitted, encouraged, aided, or assisted by one or more student organization executive officers or by one or more members while acting with authority on behalf of the student organization;
  3. Student organization resources, such as funds, group communications, information technology resources, or organization property or venues, were used for the prohibited conduct;
  4. The student organization, through its officers or advisers, materially interferes or interfered with any investigation or conduct proceedings related to the prohibited conduct;
  5. A policy, protocol, or official practice of the student organization caused or materially contributed to the prohibited conduct; and/or
  6. In the absence of any evidence of the factors listed in subdivisions a. – e. above, the prohibited conduct was committed, participated in, encouraged, aided, or assisted by twenty-five percent or more of the student organization’s members;
2. Factors weighing against organizational responsibility:
  1. The student organization had policies, protocols, or official practices in place to prevent or deter the prohibited conduct;
  2. The student organization had provided guidance, education, or training to the individual members involved to prevent or deter the prohibited conduct;
  3. The student organization took prompt and effective action to prevent or stop the prohibited conduct or mitigate its effects once the organization or its officers became aware or reasonably should have become aware of the prohibited conduct;
  4. The student organization or its officers promptly reported the prohibited conduct to an appropriate University official and any other appropriate authorities; and/or
  5. The student organization addressed any prohibited conduct of its members through an organizational sanction or punishment.
Prohibited Conduct for which students and student organizations, when applicable, are subject to sanctions falls into the following categories:
1. Academic dishonesty, including but not limited to cheating, plagiarism, unauthorized use of artificially generated content, or sabotage. The Board of Curators recognizes that academic honesty is essential for the intellectual life of the University. Faculty members have a special obligation to expect high standards of academic honesty in all student work. Students have a special obligation to adhere to such standards. In all cases of academic dishonesty, the instructor shall make an academic judgment about the student's grade on that work and in that course, which shall not be considered a sanction for prohibited conduct under this rule. The instructor shall, consistent with other policies, report the alleged academic dishonesty to the Primary Administrative Officer.
  1. The term cheating includes but is not limited to: (i) use of any unauthorized assistance in taking quizzes, tests, examinations or other assessments; (ii) dependence upon the aid of sources beyond those authorized by the instructor in writing papers, preparing reports, solving problems, or carrying out other assignments; (iii) acquisition or possession without permission of tests or other academic material belonging to a member of the University faculty or staff; or (iv) knowingly providing any unauthorized assistance to another student on quizzes, tests, examinations, or other assessments.
  2. The term plagiarism includes, but is not limited to: (i) use by paraphrase or direct quotation of the published work of another source without properly crediting the author with footnotes, citations or bibliographical reference; (ii) unacknowledged use of materials prepared by another person or agency engaged in the selling of term papers or other academic materials; or (iii) unacknowledged use of original work/material that has been produced through collaboration with others without release in writing from collaborators.
  3. The term unauthorized use of artificially generated content, includes, but is not limited to (i) use of artificial intelligence tools or other tools that generate artificial content in taking quizzes, tests, examinations, or other assessments without permission from the instructor; (ii) submitting work for evaluation as one’s own that was produced in material or substantial part through use of artificial intelligence tools or other tools that generate artificial content without permission from the instructor; (iii) using artificial intelligence tools or other tools that generate artificial content in a manner contrary to instructions from the instructor; or (iv) using artificial intelligence tools or other tools that generate artificial content in a manner that violates any other provision of these rules concerning academic dishonesty. Use of commonly available tools such as spelling or grammar checking software or features of software that propose anticipated words or phrases while text is being written will not be considered unauthorized use of artificially generated content unless such use is contrary to instructions from the instructor.
  4. The term sabotage includes, but is not limited to, the unauthorized interference with, modification of, or destruction of the work or intellectual property of another member of the University community.
2. Forgery, alteration, or misuse of University documents, records or identification, or furnishing information to the University that the student or student organization knows or reasonably should know is false.
3. Physical abuse or other physical conduct which threatens or endangers the health or safety of any person.
4. Stalking another by engaging in a course of conduct directed at a specific person knowing or consciously disregarding a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to —(A) fear for their safety or the safety of others; or (B) suffer substantial emotional distress.
5. Violation of the University’s Equal Employment/Education Opportunity and Nondiscrimination Policy located at Section 600.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations.
6. Violation of the University’s Sexual Harassment under Title IX Policy located at Section 600.020 of the Collected Rules and Regulations.
7. Threats, defined as communication of a serious expression of intent to commit an act of unlawful violence against an individual or identifiable group, such that the individual or group would reasonably fear violence, regardless of whether the communicating individual actually intends to carry out the threat, and in which the person engaging in the communication knew or consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that it would have such an effect on the individual or identifiable group.
8. Participating in attempted or actual taking of, damage to, or possession without permission of property of the University or of a member of the University community or a campus visitor.
9. Unauthorized possession, duplication or use of keys or other means of access to any University facilities or unauthorized entry to or use of University facilities, property or resources.
10. Misuse of University or personal property in a manner that creates a safety hazard or unauthorized use of safety equipment.
11. Deliberately setting off a fire or other emergency alarm without justified reason or knowingly giving a false report of a crime or emergency.
12. Violation of the available written policies, rules or regulations of the University or any of its units applicable to the student under the circumstances or of material conduct standards identified in contracts or agreements the student has entered into with the University, including, but not limited to, those governing residence in the University-provided housing, or the use of University facilities, or student organizations, or the time, place or manner of public expression.
13. Violation of applicable federal, state, foreign or local law or ordinance, that directly impacts the University’s activities, programs, property, students, employees, or volunteers or indicates that the individual poses a risk to the safety, welfare, or well-being of the University’s students, employees, or volunteers.
14. Manufacture, use, possession, sale or distribution of alcoholic beverages or any controlled substance under state or federal law without proper prescription or required license or as expressly permitted by law or University regulations, including operating a vehicle on University property, or on streets or roadways adjacent to and abutting a campus, under the influence of alcohol or a controlled substance as prohibited by law of the state of Missouri. To the extent there is any inconsistency between state and federal law as to circumstances in which manufacture, use, possession, sale or distribution of a substance is expressly permitted, federal law will govern to the extent appropriate to facilitate the University’s compliance with the Drug Free Schools and Communities Act and any other applicable federal law.
15. Substantially disrupting, or inciting others to substantially disrupt:
  1. University operations, functions or activities including, but not limited to classes or other teaching, research, study, lectures, performances, meetings, interviews, living or learning communities, administrative business, or ceremonies or other public events, regardless of whether such operations, functions or activities are conducted in-person or through information technology resources; or
  2. Authorized or permissible non-University activities that occur at a location owned or controlled by the University or through information technology resources provided by the University.
16. Failure to comply with lawful directions of University officials acting in the performance of their duties or failure to identify one’s self to University officials acting in the performance of their duties when reasonably requested to do so and upon reasonable explanation of the reason for the request for identification.
17. Failure to comply with and complete all sanctions and remedial actions applied under Section 200.020 or Chapter 600 within the time frame specified.
18. The possession or use of firearms, explosives, other weapons, or hazardous chemicals that violates federal or state law or applicable foreign law or University rules.
19. Hazing, defined as an act that endangers the mental or physical health or safety of a student, or an act that is likely to cause physical or psychological harm to any person within the University community, or that destroys or removes, damages, defaces, or tampers with public or private property, for the purpose of initiation, admission into, affiliation with, or as a condition for continued membership in a group or organization. Participation or cooperation by the person(s) being hazed does not excuse the violation. Failure by a group’s or organization’s executive officers to intervene to prevent, discourage, and/or report hazing of which they are aware or reasonably should be aware also will be deemed a violation of this policy.
20. Misuse of information technology resources in accordance with University policy, including but not limited to:
  1. Actual or attempted theft or other abuse;
  2. Unauthorized entry into a file to use, read, or change the contents, or for any other purpose;
  3. Unauthorized transfer of a file;
  4. Unauthorized use of another individual's identification and password;
  5. Use of information technology facilities to interfere with the work of another student, faculty member, or University official;
  6. Use of information technology facilities to interfere with normal operation of any University information technology system;
  7. Knowingly causing a virus, malware, or other means designed to disrupt, damage or gain unauthorized access to become installed in any information technology system or file; or
  8. Violation of Section 110.005 of the Collected Rules or Regulations or other University policy governing use of computing resources.
21. Retaliation, False Reporting, Witness Intimidation or Harassment, and Interference.
  1. Retaliation is any adverse action taken against a person because of that person’s participation or refusal to participate in the process set forth in CRR 200.020, provided that the exercise of rights protected under the First Amendment does not constitute retaliation prohibited under this section. Any person who engages in such retaliation shall be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including expulsion or termination, in accordance with applicable procedures. Any person who believes they have been subjected to retaliation is encouraged to notify the Primary Administrative Officer. The University will promptly respond to all claims of retaliation in accordance with this policy.
  2. False reporting is making an intentional false report or accusation in relation to this policy as opposed to a report or accusation, which, even if erroneous, is made in good faith. False reporting is prohibited.
  3. No individual, directly or through others, may take any action which attempts to or actually intimidates any potential Party or witness in the student conduct process, or which may interfere with the student conduct process.
  4. All University employees and students must be truthful and candid when making any statement or providing any information or evidence to the University throughout the student conduct process, and all documentary evidence must be genuine and accurate. The fact that a determination has been made that a student has or has not engaged in prohibited conduct is not sufficient grounds, by itself, to declare that a false statement or fraudulent evidence has been provided by a Party or witness.
  5. Charging an individual with a policy violation for making a materially false statement in bad faith in the course of any proceedings under this policy does not constitute retaliation provided, however that a determination regarding responsibility, alone, is not sufficient to conclude that any Party made a materially false statement in bad faith.
22. Attempting to commit or intentionally and materially aiding or inciting others to commit any of the forms of prohibited conduct stated in this rule.

200.015 Academic Inquiry, Course Discussion and Privacy

kuscheld — Wed, 28 Dec 2011 18:11:30 +0000

200.015 Academic Inquiry, Course Discussion and Privacy kuscheld Wed, 12/28/2011 - 18:11

Executive Order No. 38, 12-20-11.

The Board of Curators of the ��ϲʹ�� long ago adopted a statement emphasizing the importance of academic freedom as it relates to faculty members. That statement, found at Section 310.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations, expresses the view that academic freedom of its academic staff is “indispensable to the success of the ��ϲʹ�� in fulfilling its obligations to its students and to society.” However, that statement does not address, in any significant way, the importance of academic inquiry and discourse for students of the ��ϲʹ��.

It is vitally important for the ��ϲʹ�� to foster and maintain an educational environment that promotes free discussion, inquiry and expression by students, both inside the course and out, without fear that their exercise of such rights will have negative repercussions in areas over which the ��ϲʹ�� has responsibility. It is equally important that students understand the narrow line separating their First Amendment rights and the legal and privacy rights of others so that students can exercise those rights with responsibility.

Goals and Aspirations
1. Information about student views, beliefs, and political associations that fellow students acquire in the context of course discussions should be handled responsibly. Students are encouraged to be sensitive to the potential that dissemination of information about fellow students derived from course discussions may be perceived as defamatory and/or may subject them to ridicule, harassment or reprisal from those who do not agree with the views, beliefs or political associations expressed in the course.
2. Information about student views, beliefs, and political associations that faculty members acquire in the context of course discussions should be handled responsibly. Faculty members are encouraged to be sensitive to the potential that dissemination of information about students derived from course discussions may be perceived as defamatory and/or may subject them to ridicule, harassment or reprisal from those who do not agree with the views, beliefs or political associations expressed in the course.
Restrictions on Disclosure and Distribution—Prohibitions
1. Faculty should encourage free discussion, inquiry, and expression in courses, conferences and meetings. Student performance shall be evaluated solely on an academic basis, not on opinions or conduct in matters unrelated to academic standards.
2. Students may make audio or video recordings of course activity unless specifically prohibited by the faculty member.
  1. To foster a safe environment for learning, however, the redistribution of audio or video recordings of statements or comments from the course to individuals who are not students in the course is prohibited without the express permission of the faculty member and of any students who are recorded. Unauthorized distribution of such materials is a violation of academic standards and may violate copyright laws and/or privacy rights. Students found to have violated this policy are subject to discipline in accordance with the provisions of Section 200.020 of the Collected Rules and Regulations of the ��ϲʹ�� pertaining to student conduct matters. Faculty and staff found to have violated this policy are subject to discipline in accordance with applicable University policies.
Student Records
1. The federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C.§1232g, and the ��ϲʹ��’s policy on student records, Section 180.020 and Section 180.025 of the Collected Rules and Regulations, describe student rights of access and rights of privacy which a student can expect with regard to his or her education records. That law and University policy applies whether those education records are in hard copy, are electronically stored or are contained along with other images either recorded or broadcast in connection with courses available online or through distance learning. The content of such education records should not be shared with individuals, other than individuals who have been determined by the ��ϲʹ�� to have an educational need to know, except in accordance with the provisions of FERPA and University policy.
Nothing in this Executive Order may conflict with the provisions of Section 240.040 of the Collected Rules and Regulations, “Policy Related to Students with Disabilities.”

200.020 Rules of Procedures in Student or Student Organization Conduct Matters

kuscheld — Thu, 27 May 2010 16:20:00 +0000

200.020 Rules of Procedures in Student or Student Organization Conduct Matters kuscheld Thu, 05/27/2010 - 16:20

Bd. Min. 11-8-68, Amended Bd. Min. 3-20-81; Bd. Min. 12-8-89; Amended 5-19-94; Bd. Min. 5-24-01; Bd. Min. 7-27-12, 6-19-14; Revised 9-22-14 by Executive Order 41; Revised 11-3-15 by Executive Order 41; Amended 2-9-17; Bd. Min. 9-24-20; Amended 6-29-23.

Preamble. The following rules of procedure in student or student organization conduct matters are hereby adopted in order to ensure insofar as possible and practicable (a) that the requirements of procedural due process in student conduct proceedings will be fulfilled by the University, (b) that the immediate effectiveness of Section 10.030, which is Article VI of the Bylaws of the Board of Curators relating to student conduct and sanctions may be secured for all students in the ��ϲʹ��, and (c) that procedures shall be definite and determinable within the ��ϲʹ��. Student or student organization conduct involving discrimination and harassment, including sexual harassment is governed by Section 600.030: Resolution Process for Resolving Complaints of Sexual Harassment under Title IX, and Section 600.040: Equity Resolution Process for Resolving Complaints of Discrimination and Harassment against a Faculty Member or Student or Student Organization.

The student conduct process, which is governed by these rules of procedure, is further intended to implement Section 200.010 Standard of Conduct in a manner that supports the University’s mission as an educational institution and protects the University’s educational environment. To the extent consistent with those goals, the student conduct process is intended to be a feature of an educational experience for the students involved, with a range of responses that may include educational responses, remedies or sanctions that will help students recognize the impact of their conduct for themselves and on the broader community and advance their academic and personal development.

The provisions of the Standard of Conduct, these Rules of Procedure, and any University policies concerning student conduct do not create any rights, expressly or by implication, in, for, or on behalf of any person or entity other than students and other members of the University community who are governed by such rules.
Definitions. As used in these rules, the following definitions shall apply:
1. Primary Administrative Officers. As used in these procedures, the Chief Student Affairs Administrator on each campus shall appoint the Primary Administrative Officer except in cases of academic dishonesty, where the Chief Academic Administrator is the Primary Administrative Officer. Each Primary Administrative Officer may appoint designee(s) who are responsible for the administration of these conduct procedures, provided all such appointments are made in writing and filed with the Chancellor of the campus and the Office of General Counsel. The Primary Administrator's Office will certify in writing that the given designee has been trained in the administration of student conduct matters.
2. Student Panelist Pool. The student panelist pool is a panel of students appointed by the Chief Student Affairs Administrator, who may participate on the Student Conduct Committee. Specifically, if requested by the accused student or student organization, the Chair of the Student Conduct Committee shall select not more than three students from the Student Panelist Pool to serve as members on the Student Conduct Committee, or not more than two students to serve as members on a Hearing Panel.
3. Student. A person having once been admitted to the University who has not completed a course of study and who intends to or does continue a course of study in or through one of the Universities of the University System. For the purpose of these rules, student status continues whether or not the University's academic programs are in session.
4. Student Organization. A recognized student organization which has received official approval in accordance with Section 250.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations. Three members of the organization may represent the student organization in all proceedings. The registered faculty/staff adviser may be present, but may not act on behalf of the student organization. The organization may utilize an attorney in all proceedings as it chooses, subject to other provisions in this rule. Each student organization shall designate, and such designation shall be on file with the University, the individual who will receive all notices, findings, determinations and decisions on behalf of the student organization. If the student organization fails to have a designation on file with the University, the President of the organization is the default designee. The registered faculty/staff adviser will also be sent a courtesy copy of all notices, findings, determinations and decisions.
5. Student Conduct Committee. As used in these procedures, "Student Conduct Committee," hereinafter referred to as the Committee, is that body on each campus which is authorized to conduct hearings and to make dispositions under these procedures or a Hearing Panel of such body as herein defined.
6. Hearing Panel. As used in these procedures, the term "hearing panel" refers to the part of the Student Conduct Committee described in Section 200.020.E.4 below.
7. Party or Parties. The term “Party” or “Parties” refers to accused students or student organization and the Primary Administrative Officer in the context of formal procedure and disposition.
Sanctions.
1. The following sanctions, when applicable, may be imposed upon any student or student organization found to have violated the Standard of Conduct. More than one of the sanctions may be imposed for any single violation. Sanctions include but are not limited to:
  1. Warning. A notice in writing to the student or student organization that there is or has been a violation of the institutional regulations.
  2. Probation. A written reprimand for violation of specified regulations. Probation is for a designated period of time and includes the probability of more severe sanctions if the student or student organization is found to be violating any institutional regulation(s) during the probationary period.
  3. Loss of Privileges. Denial of specified privileges of the student or student organization for a designated period of time.
  4. Restitution. Compensation by the student or student organization for loss, damage, or injury to the University or University property. This may take the form of appropriate service and/or monetary or material replacement.
  5. Discretionary Sanctions. Work assignments, service to the University or community, or other related discretionary assignments, or completion of educational programming or counseling.
  6. University System Housing Suspension. Separation of the student or student organization from University owned or operated housing for a definite period of time, after which the student or student organization is eligible to return. Conditions for readmission may be specified.
  7. University System Housing Expulsion. Permanent separation of the student or student organization from University owned or operated housing.
  8. University System Dismissal. An involuntary separation of the student from the University System for misconduct. It is less than permanent in nature and does not imply or state a minimum separation time.
  9. Campus Suspension. A student is suspended from being allowed on a specific University campus for a definite period of time. Logistical modifications consistent with the sanction imposed, may be granted at the discretion of the Chief Student Affairs Administrator (or Designee) of that campus. Conditions for readmission may be specified.
  10. University System Suspension. Separation of the student from the University System for a definite period of time, after which the student is eligible to return. Logistical modifications consistent with the sanction imposed, may be granted at the discretion of the Chief Student Affairs Administrator (or Designee) of the campus where the modifications would apply. Conditions for readmission may be specified.
  11. University System Expulsion. Permanent separation of the student from the University System.
  12. Withdrawal of Recognition. Student organization loses its official approval as a recognized student organization. May be either temporary or permanent. Conditions for future approval may be specified.
2. The sanctions listed above shall be imposed in a manner that is reasonably proportionate to the violation in question, with consideration given to the severity of the violation, culpability of those involved, past dispositions in similar cases, and other factors as appropriate.
3. Temporary Action for a Student. The Chancellor or Designee may at any time temporarily suspend, deny readmission to, or place conditions on the attendance or participation of a student, effective immediately, pending formal procedures when the Chancellor or Designee finds and believes from available information that the student’s continued attendance or participation would seriously disrupt the University operations or constitute a danger to the health, safety, or welfare of members of the University community. The Chancellor or Designee will give the student notice of such temporary action and the detailed reason for it in the same manner as for a Notice of Hearing described in these Rules of Procedure. Notice shall be deemed delivered in the same manner as a Notice of Hearing. Within five (5) business days of delivery of the notice, the student may submit a written response requesting reconsideration and/or modification of the temporary action. The time for submitting such written response may be extended upon written request at the discretion of the Chancellor or Designee for good cause. After due consideration of the response and all relevant circumstances, the Chancellor or Designee will sustain, remove, or modify the temporary action and notify the student of that decision. The appropriate procedure to determine the future status of the student will be initiated within seven (7) business days from the date the temporary action is taken.
4. Temporary Action for a Student Organization. The Chancellor or Designee may at any time temporarily suspend or place conditions on the student organization’s University recognition, access to and use of the University campus/facilities/events and/or all other University activities or privileges for which the student organization might otherwise be eligible, effective immediately, pending formal procedures when the Chancellor or Designee finds and believes from available information that the student organization’s continued recognition, access, or use would seriously disrupt the University or constitute a danger to the health, safety, or welfare of members of the University community. The Chancellor or Designee will give the student organization notice of such temporary action and the detailed reason for it in the same manner as for a Notice of Hearing described in these Rules of Procedure. Notice shall be deemed delivered in the same manner as a Notice of Hearing. Within five (5) business days of delivery of the notice, the student organization may submit a written response requesting reconsideration and/or modification of the temporary action. The time for submitting such written response may be extended upon written request at the discretion of the Chancellor or Designee for good cause. After due consideration of the response and all relevant circumstances, the Chancellor or Designee will sustain, remove, or modify the temporary action and notify the student organization of that decision. The appropriate procedure to determine the future status of the student organization will be initiated within seven (7) business days from the date the temporary action is taken.
Records Retention. Student conduct records shall be maintained in accordance with applicable University rules and records retention policies.
Policy and Procedures.
1. General Policies and Rights.
  1. Standard of proof and presumption of non-responsibility. A student or student organization is presumed not responsible for any alleged violation of the Standard of Conduct until a determination regarding responsibility is made at the conclusion of the student conduct process. The standard of proof will be “preponderance of the evidence,” defined as determining whether evidence shows it is more likely than not that a violation occurred. The burden of proof and the burden of gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination regarding responsibility rests on the University.
  2. Other proceedings. Students may potentially be held accountable through the University’s student conduct process and other educational operations, as well as through other systems, such as the criminal justice system, civil litigation, or proceedings of various regulatory agencies or outside non-governmental organizations. The University’s student conduct process is separate from other systems, and action under the University’s student conduct process may occur before, during or after any proceedings through other systems. The University’s student conduct process, including any hearing, is not a criminal or judicial proceeding and is designed to address student conduct in an educational context; therefore, alleged violations of the Standard of Conduct will be addressed independently of any outcome or proceedings in other non-University systems.
  3. General rights of students and student organizations involved in the student conduct process.
    
    (1) To be treated with respect by university officials;
    (2) To be free from retaliation;
    (3) To have access to university support resources (such as counseling and mental health services and University health services);
    (4) To receive timely detailed written notice of any charges against them and the date, time, location, participants, and purpose of all hearings, investigative interviews, or other meetings;
    (5) To have an adviser of the student’s or organization’s choice, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, accompany the student or organization’s representatives to all interviews, meetings, hearings and proceedings throughout the conduct process;
    (6) To refuse to have an allegation resolved through informal disposition without prejudice;
    (7) Not to present self-incriminating information;
    (8) To remain silent, with such silence not considered as evidence supporting a finding of a violation;
    (9) To receive written notice of any delay of the process or limited extension of time frames; and
    (10) Not to be subject to charges under these procedures if in a prior proceeding the student or student organization has received a notice of proposed informal disposition or notice of hearing under these rules regarding the same incident of alleged misconduct.
  4. Responsible action in emergencies. The University encourages students to take responsible action in emergency situations, even if prohibited conduct may have occurred in conjunction with such an emergency.
    
    (1) Examples of such responsible action include:
    
    (a) Immediately alerting appropriate officials (e.g., calling 911) of the emergency, including providing the student’s own name and the location and description of the emergency;
    (b) Remaining at the scene of the emergency, so long as it is safe to do so; and
    (c) Cooperating with emergency officials.
    
    (2) Decision makers acting under these rules of procedure will favorably consider the positive impact of taking responsible action in an emergency situation when determining the appropriate response to any alleged prohibited conduct by a student or student organization that may have occurred in conjunction with the emergency situation. This may include implementing educational responses or remedies other than conduct proceedings or reduced sanctions. Further, the University will not use statements made by a student in the course of immediately reporting an emergency situation to appropriate authorities as evidence to support a finding of a violation of the Standard of Conduct by the reporting student or a student organization of which the student is a member.
    (3) Failure to take responsible actions in an emergency situation may be considered an aggravating factor in determining sanctions for prohibited conduct.
    (4) Students who are acting in capacities as student workers or student volunteers are encouraged to follow applicable policies or training they have received from the university in addressing any emergency situation.
  5. Confidentiality. The University must keep confidential the identity of any student who has made a report of alleged prohibited conduct, any student or student organization that has been accused or is otherwise suspected of prohibited conduct, and any witness, except as may be permitted by the FERPA statute, 20 U.S.C. 1232g, or FERPA regulations, 34 CFR part 99, or as required by law, or to carry out the purposes of applicable law, including the conduct of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding arising thereunder. The University will not prevent any review or copying of law enforcement records that is allowed by law.
  6. Processing fee. As approved and modified by the Chancellor from time to time, each campus may adopt a processing fee not to exceed $300 to be charged to any student or student organization found responsible for prohibited conduct to defray costs of the student conduct process. Such fee may be set at different levels for student organizations than for individual students, but shall not otherwise vary by organization or individual.
2. Preliminary Procedures. The Primary Administrative Officer or Designee (hereafter “Primary Administrative Officer”) is responsible for application and interpretation of the Standard of Conduct and determining appropriate approaches to implement it. Upon receiving a report of or otherwise becoming aware of potential misconduct, the Primary Administrative Officer will devise and implement an educational response on how to proceed based on relevant factors, including but not limited to the severity of the potential misconduct; health, safety, or welfare of the student and members of the University community; and impact on members of the University community and the educational environment.
  1. Alternative resolutions. At any point in the process, the Primary Administrative Officer may work with students involved under the circumstances to explore alternative educational solutions or remedies or other alternative resolutions in lieu of formal conduct procedures, findings of responsibility or possible sanctions. Informal negotiated resolutions without necessity of a hearing are encouraged and statements made by a student or student organization or their adviser during such negotiations shall not be used against the student or student organization in later hearings. A student or student organization may refuse to participate in alternative educational solutions or remedies or other alternative resolutions and in the event of such refusal, the matter will be addressed under these Rules of Procedure.
  2. Investigation; Consultations. The Primary Administrative Officer shall investigate any student or student organization misconduct before initiating formal conduct procedures and give the student or student organization the opportunity to present a personal or organizational version of the incident or occurrence. The Primary Administrative Officer shall utilize the preponderance of the evidence standard in deciding whether or not to initiate formal conduct procedures and in deciding whether or not to offer an informal disposition in accordance with Section 200.020.E.2 below. The Primary Administrative Officer may discuss with any student or student organization such alleged misconduct and the student or student organization shall attend such consultation as directed by the Primary Administrative Officer. If directing attendance at a consultation, the Primary Administrative Officer will inform the student or student organization of the right to have an adviser attend and participate. Parties involved in the student conduct process are not prohibited from discussing the allegations under investigation or from gathering and presenting relevant evidence. Parties may present witnesses and other inculpatory and exculpatory evidence so long as such evidence is relevant.
  3. Use of Non-Binding Student Courts, Etc. The Primary Administrative Officer, in making an investigation and informal disposition, may choose to utilize student courts and boards and/or divisional deans to make non- binding recommendations to the Primary Administrative Officer. In that event, the Primary Administrative Officer shall notify the student or student organization of the identity and contact information of the student court, board, or divisional dean from which a recommendation is being sought. Such notification also shall inform the student or student organization that participation in any proceeding before the student court, board, or divisional dean is voluntary on the part of the student or student organization and that any resulting recommendation is non-binding. There will be no adverse consequence or inference from declining to participate in any proceeding before the student court, board, or divisional dean. Neither the choice to decline to participate nor the recommendation of the student court, board, or divisional dean will be shared with the Committee in connection with any subsequent hearing.
  4. Departure from University During Process. Should a student decide to leave the University and not participate in the investigation or other steps of the student conduct process without signing a Voluntary Permanent Separation and General Release Agreement and without the approval of the Primary Administrative Officer, the Primary Administrative Officer may place a hold up on the student’s readmission and the student will not be permitted to return to the University System until the student conduct process is completed with respect to the potential prohibited conduct. Should a student organization decide to abandon recognition by the University and not participate in the investigation or other steps of the student conduct process, the Primary Administrative Officer may direct that the student organization may not be granted recognition in the future until the student conduct process is completed with respect to the potential prohibited conduct.
3. Informal Dispositions. The Primary Administrative Officer shall have the authority to propose an informal disposition consisting of a preliminary determination and proposed appropriate remedies and/or sanctions. The Primary Administrative officer shall provide written notice of the proposed informal disposition. The notice shall inform the student or student organization that the failure to reject the proposed informal disposition within ten (10) business days may be considered as acceptance. If the student or student organization fails to submit a rejection to the Primary Administrative Officer within ten (10) business days, the proposed informal disposition shall become final. The time for rejecting the informal disposition may be extended upon written request at the discretion of the Primary Administrative Officer for good cause. If the student or student organization rejects informal disposition it must be in writing and shall be forwarded to the Committee. The Primary Administrative Officer may refer cases to the Committee without first offering informal disposition.
4. Formal Procedure and Disposition.
  1. Student Conduct Committee:
    
    (1) The Committee shall be appointed by the Chief Student Affairs Administrator and shall have the authority to impose appropriate sanctions upon any accused student or students or student organization appearing before it.
    (2) When deemed appropriate or convenient by the Chair of the Committee, the Chair may divide the Committee into Hearing Panels each consisting of no less than five (5) Committee members of which no more than two (2) shall be students. If the Chair creates such Hearing Panels, the Chair of the Committee shall designate a Hearing Panel Chair. A Hearing Panel has the authority of the whole Committee in those cases assigned to it. The Chair of the Committee or a Hearing Panel Chair shall count as one member of the Committee or Hearing Panel and have the same rights as other members.
    (3) The Chief Student Affairs Administrator shall appoint a panel of students, to be known as the Student Panelist Pool. Upon written request of an accused student or the student organization designee before the Committee made at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the hearing, the Chair of the Committee shall appoint from the Student Panelist Pool not more than three students to sit with the Committee or the Hearing Panel Chair shall appoint two students to sit with the Hearing Panel for that particular case. When students from the Student Panelist Pool serve as members of the Committee or as members of the Hearing Panel, they shall have the same rights as other members of the Committee or Hearing Panel.
    (4) The Chief Student Affairs Administrator shall ensure that members of the Committee and Student Panelist Pool receive training on the Standard of Conduct and these Rules of Procedure. Members of the Committee and Student Panelist Pool will be removed if they fail to satisfy training requirements, as determined by the Chief Student Affairs Administrator.
    (5) Hearing Panel members, including the chair, or other Student Conduct Committee members who are to participate in the hearing of a case shall not have a conflict of interest with respect to or bias for or against accused students or student organizations generally, or for or against any Party, individual who reported alleged prohibited conduct, or Party affected by the alleged prohibited conduct. If such a member identifies a conflict of interest or bias, or otherwise cannot make an objective determination, the member must recuse from the proceedings in advance of the hearing.
    (6) The accused student or student organization will have been given the names of the Committee or Hearing Panel members and Chair who will hear the case in the Notice of Hearing. Should any accused student or student organization object to any member or chair, they must raise all objections, in writing, to the Chief Student Affairs Administrator no later than five (5) business days prior to the hearing unless, for good cause, the Chief Student Affairs Administrator allows objections to be raised later. Such objection shall be confidential and shall not be disclosed to the Committee or Hearing Panel. A member may be unseated by the Chief Student Affairs Administrator for good cause. Good cause may include, but is not limited to, bias that would preclude an impartial hearing or circumstances in which the member’s or chair’s involvement could impact the accused student’s work or learning environment due to current or potential interactions with the member or chair (e.g., a panel member serving as an instructor or adviser to the accused student or student organization). If the Chief Student Affairs Administrator determines that a member or chair should be replaced, the Chief Student Affairs Administrator will select a replacement from the Student Conduct Committee. The Chief Student Affairs Administrator will provide a written response to all Parties addressing any objections to a member or chair.
  2. General Statement of Procedures. A student or student organization accused of violating the Student Conduct Code is entitled to a written notice of the specific charges at issue and a formal hearing unless the matter is disposed of under the rules for informal disposition. Student conduct proceedings serve educational purposes identified in the Standard of Conduct and these Rules of Procedure and are not to be construed as judicial trials. Formal rules of evidence and civil procedure do not apply; but care shall be taken to comply as fully as possible with the spirit and intent of the procedural safeguards set forth in these Rules of Procedure. For formal hearing dispositions, decisions on responsibility for conduct violations must be based on relevant information submitted at the hearing, and any relevant information provided to the hearing panel in advance of the hearing with notice to the accused student or student organization and the Primary Administrative Office and the opportunity for the Parties to respond to such information. The Office of the General Counsel shall be legal adviser to the Committee and the Primary Administrative Officer, but the same attorney from the Office of the General Counsel shall not perform both roles with regard to the same case and attorneys from the Office of the General Counsel performing distinct roles on the same case will not discuss the merits of the case with one another.
  3. Notice of Hearing. At least twenty (20) business days prior to the Student Conduct Committee Hearing, or as far in advance as is reasonably possible if an accelerated resolution process is scheduled with the consent of the accused student or student organization, the Primary Administrative Officer will send a letter to the accused student or student organization (or to the student or student organization’s adviser if requested by the student or student organization) with the following information:
    
    (1) A detailed description of the alleged conduct at issue and applicable policies, rules, or regulations alleged to be violated;
    (2) A description of the applicable procedures, including right to have an adviser, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney;
    (3) A statement of the potential sanctions/remedial actions that could result;
    (4) A statement notifying the student or student organization that they will be permitted to inspect, copy, and review any evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations to be addressed at the hearing, including the evidence upon which the University does not intend to rely in reaching a determination regarding responsibility and including inculpatory or exculpatory evidence;
    (5) A statement notifying the Parties that they must be truthful when making any statement or providing any information or evidence to the University throughout the student conduct process, and all documentary evidence must be genuine and accurate;
    (6) A statement that nothing in these procedures is intended to alter any rights the individual may have under applicable state or federal statutory laws or the U.S. Constitution;
    (7) The names of the Committee or Hearing Panel members and Chair who will hear the case, and information on how to raise an objection to any member or chair and the timeline in which to raise any objections; and
    (8) The time, date and location of the hearing. If any Party does not appear at the hearing, the hearing will be held in their absence.
    
    This Notice of Hearing letter will be made in writing and will be delivered either: 1) in person, 2) by email only to the Party’s University-issued email account if the Party has consented electronically or in writing to receipt of all notifications by email; or 3) mailed to the mailing address of the respective Party as indicated in the official University records and emailed to the Party’s University-issued email account. If there is no local address on file, mail will be sent to the Party’s permanent address. Notice also shall be mailed and emailed to the Party’s adviser, if an adviser has been identified by the Party.
    
    Notice is presumptively deemed delivered, when: 1) provided in person or 2) emailed to the Party (when prior consent - whether electronically or in writing - has been given to receipt of all notifications by email or 3) when mailed and emailed to the Party and the Party’s adviser, if an adviser has been identified by the Party.
    
    Any request to reschedule the hearing shall be made in writing to the Chair, who shall have the authority to reschedule the hearing if the request is timely and made for good cause. The Chair shall notify the Primary Administrative Officer and the accused student or student organization of the new date for the hearing. If the accused student or student organization fails to appear at the scheduled time, the Committee may hear and determine the matter.
5. Right to Petition for Review.
  1. Except in cases where a right of appeal applies, the Primary Administrative Officer or the accused student or student organization may petition the Chancellor or Designee in writing for a review of the decision within ten (10) business days after written notification. A copy of the Petition for Review must also be served upon the non-appealing Party or Parties within such time. The Petition for Review must state the grounds for review in detail, and the non-appealing Party or Parties may answer the petition within ten (10) business days. Upon written request, the Chancellor or Designee may extend the time for petition or answer for good cause.
  2. The Chancellor or Designee may review or refuse to review the decision. In all cases where the Petition for Review is refused, the action of the Committee shall be final. If review is granted, the Chancellor or Designee may affirm, reverse or modify the decision, or remand the case for further proceedings. The action of the Chancellor or Designee after review shall be final unless it is to remand the matter for further proceedings.
6. Right of Appeal (involving issues of University expulsion, University dismissal, University suspension or Withdrawal of Recognition only).
  1. When an accused student is expelled, dismissed, or suspended from the University or when a student organization has its recognition withdrawn, either temporarily or permanently, by the Committee or when such sanctions have been expressly requested by the Primary Administrative Officer and refused by the Committee, the Primary Administrative Officer or the accused student or student organization may appeal such decision to the Chancellor by filing written notice of appeal stating the grounds for appeal in detail with the Chancellor within ten (10) business days after notification of the decision of the Committee. The appealing Party may file a written memorandum for consideration by the Chancellor with the Notice of Appeal. A copy of the Notice of Appeal and any memorandum must also be served upon the non-appealing Party or Parties within such time, and any other Party may submit a reply to such memorandum within ten (10) business days. Upon written request, the Chancellor or Designee may extend the time for appeal or reply for good cause.
  2. The Chancellor shall review the record of the case and the appeal documents and may affirm, reverse or modify the decision, or remand the case for further proceedings. The Chancellor shall notify the accused student or student organization in writing of the decision on the appeal. The action of the Chancellor shall be final unless it is to remand the matter for further proceedings.
7. Grounds for Review or Appeal. Grounds for appeals are limited to the following:
  1. A material deviation from established procedures that affected the outcome of the matter;
  2. To consider new evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the decision was made that could affect the outcome of the matter;
  3. The Committee members or Student Panelists demonstrated a conflict of interest or bias against students or student organizations generally or against the particular student or student organization that affected the outcome of the case; and/or
  4. The sanctions fall outside the range typically imposed for this offense, or for the cumulative conduct record of the student or student organization.
  Review or appeal is not intended to be a full rehearing of the case and is therefore deferential to the original findings. In most cases, appeals are confined to a review of the written documentation and Record of the Case, and relevant documentation regarding the grounds for review or appeal. A review or appeal granted based on new evidence should normally be remanded to the original decision- maker for reconsideration. The Chancellor or Designee will normally render a written decision, with an explanation of reasons, on the review or appeal to all Parties within ten (10) business days after receiving the answer or reply, or after the deadline for answer or reply has passed without a submission being made. In the event the Chancellor or Designee is unable to render a written decision within ten (10) business days, the Chancellor or Designee will promptly notify the Parties in writing of the delay. Once a review or appeal is decided, the outcome is final. Further appeals and grievances are not permitted.
8. Status During Appeal.
  1. In cases of suspension, dismissal, or expulsion where a Notice of Appeal is filed within the required time, a student may petition the Chancellor in writing for permission to attend classes pending final determination of appeal. The Chancellor may permit a student to continue in school under such conditions as may be designated pending completion of appellate procedures, provided such continuance will not seriously disrupt the University or constitute a danger to the health, safety, or welfare of members of the University community. In such event, however, any final sanctions imposed shall be effective from the date of the action of the Committee.
  2. In cases of withdrawal of recognition where a Notice of Appeal is filed within a required time, a student organization may petition the Chancellor in writing to stay the withdrawal of recognition while the appeal is pending. The Chancellor may stay the withdrawal of recognition under such conditions as may be designated pending completion of appellate procedures, provided such continuance will not seriously disrupt the University or constitute a danger to the health, safety, or welfare of members of the University community.
9. Student Honor System. Forums under the student honor systems established for investigating facts, holding hearings, and recommending and imposing sanctions are authorized when the student honor code or other regulations containing well defined jurisdictional statements and satisfying the requirements of Article VI of the Bylaws of the Board of Curators, Section 10.030, and notice thereof in writing has been furnished to students subject thereto. Though the student honor system has jurisdiction, together with procedures set forth therein, instead of the Primary Administrative Officer, the standard of conduct called for in any such student honor system shall be deemed to contain at a minimum the same standards set forth in Section 200.010, entitled Standards of Conduct. Procedures shall satisfy the requirements of Article VI of the Board of Curators' Bylaws, Section 10.030, and shall contain procedures herein before stated insofar as appropriate and adaptable to the particular situation. Before it can be implemented, a student honor system and any amendment to a student honor system must be approved as provided herein. A proposed student honor system or amendment must be approved by the applicable dean, then the Chancellor, and then the Office of the General Counsel. After such approvals, the proposed student honor system or amendment must be submitted to the Board of Curators for approval. Students subject to student honor systems shall have the rights of appeal as set forth in Section 200.020.E.6.
Hearing Procedures.
1. Pre-Hearing Disclosures.
  1. Primary Administrative Officer’s Disclosure. At least ten (10) business days prior to the hearing, the Primary Administrative Officer will provide the accused student or student organization, the student’s or organization's adviser if an adviser has been identified by the student or organization, and the Chair:
    
    (1) An investigative report that fairly summarizes the relevant evidence in an electronic format or hard copy for their review and any written response as described below;
    (2) A list of the names of the proposed witnesses to be called by the Primary Administrative Officer;
    (3) Copies of all proposed documentary, photographic, video, or audio evidence;
    (4) Notification that all of the evidence gathered in the course of the investigation that is directly related to the allegations to be addressed at the hearing is available to the student or student organization and instructions regarding how to request access to that information, which shall include evidence upon which the University does not intend to rely in reaching a determination regarding responsibility and including inculpatory or exculpatory evidence;
    
    1. If any evidence that otherwise would have been subject to inclusion in the notice is received after the notice is issued, such evidence will be provided to the accused student or student organization as soon as practicable before the hearing date; and
    
    (5) Notice that the Parties may request a virtual hearing and/or any necessary accommodations.
  2. Student or Student Organization’s Disclosure. At least five (5) business days prior to the hearing, the accused student or student organization will provide to the Primary Administrative Officer and the Chair:
    
    (1) Any written response to the investigative report that the student or student organization may wish to submit;
    (2) A list of the names of proposed witnesses to be called by the student or student organization and the name of any adviser who will be attending; and
    (3) Copies of all proposed documentary, video, or audio evidence.
  3. Rebuttal Disclosure. If the Primary Administrative Officer identifies rebuttal witnesses or evidence to be called or submitted, the Primary Administrative Officer shall provide notice of such witnesses or evidence to the accused student or student organization at least two (2) business days before the hearing.
2. Request for Alternative Attendance or Questioning Mechanisms. The Chair, in consultation with and by agreement of the Parties, may decide in advance of the hearing that certain witnesses do not need to be physically present if their testimony can be adequately summarized in the investigative report or during the hearing. All Parties will have ample opportunity to present facts and arguments in full and question and cross examine all present witnesses during the hearing. All Parties shall have the right to have an adviser, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney, participate in the hearing.
  All hearings will be live (in person or virtually). However, at the request of either Party, or by the University’s designation, the live hearing may occur with the Parties located in separate rooms with technology enabling the Committee, the Parties and their advisers to simultaneously see and hear the Party or the witness answering questions. Should any hearing take place in this manner, the Chief Student Affairs Administrator or Designee shall be in charge of the technology during the hearing. The University will make reasonable accommodations for the Parties in keeping with the principles of equity and fairness. Such witnesses, however, shall still be subject to cross-examination.
3. Conduct of Hearing. The Chair shall preside at the hearing, call the hearing to order, call the roll of the Committee in attendance, ascertain the presence or absence of the student or representatives of the student organization accused of misconduct, verify the receipt of notices of hearing by the student or student organization, report any continuances requested or granted, establish the presence of any adviser of the student or student organization (who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney) and the registered faculty/staff adviser of the student organization, and call to the attention of the accused student or student organization and the adviser any special or extraordinary procedures to be employed during the hearing and permit the student or student organization to make suggestions regarding or objections to any procedures for the Committee to consider.
  1. Opening Statements.
    
    (1) The Primary Administrative Officer shall make opening remarks outlining the general nature of the case.
    (2) The accused student or student organization or adviser may make a statement to the Committee about the charge at this time or at the conclusion of the University's presentation.
  2. University Evidence.
    
    (1) The Primary Administrative Officer may state any facts the investigation has revealed. University witnesses are to be called and identified or written reports of evidence introduced as appropriate. The Committee or Panel may not rely on information in a report provided by a witness whose identity has not been disclosed to the accused Party.
    (2) The Committee may question witnesses at any time.
    (3) The accused student or student organization or the adviser may question and cross examine witnesses or examine evidence at the conclusion of the University's presentation.
  3. Accused Student or Student Organization Evidence.
    
    (1) If the accused student or student organization has not elected to make a statement earlier under a.(2) above, the accused student or student organization or adviser shall have the opportunity to make a statement to the Committee about the charge.
    (2) The accused student or student organization may present evidence through witnesses or in the form of written memoranda.
    (3) The Committee or Hearing Panel may question the accused student or representatives of the accused student organization or witnesses at any time. The Primary Administrative Officer may question the accused student or witnesses. Provided, however, that the accused student or student organization retains the right to remain silent and such silence shall not be considered as evidence supporting a finding of a violation.
  4. Rebuttal Evidence. The Committee may permit the University or the accused student or student organization or adviser to offer a rebuttal of the others' presentation(s).
  5. Rights of Student Conduct Committee. The Committee shall have the right to:
    
    (1) Hear together cases involving more than one student or more than one student organization which arise out of the same transaction or occurrence, but in that event shall make separate findings and determinations for each student or student organization;
    (2) Permit a stipulation of facts by the Primary Administrative Officer and the student or student organization involved;
    (3) Permit the incorporation in the record by reference of any documentation, produced and desired in the record by the University or the accused, provided the other Party has had an opportunity to review and respond to the documentation;
    (4) Question witnesses or challenge other evidence introduced by either the University or the student or student organization at any time;
    (5) Hear from the Primary Administrative Officer about dispositions made in similar cases and any dispositions offered to the accused student or student organization appearing before the Committee;
    (6) Call additional witnesses or require additional investigation;
    (7) Dismiss any action at any time or permit informal disposition as otherwise provided;
    (8) Permit or require at any time amendment of the Notice of Hearing to include new or additional matters which may come to the attention of the Committee before final determination of the case; provided, however, that in such event the Committee shall grant to the student or student organization or Primary Administrative Officer such time as the Committee may determine reasonable under the circumstances to answer or explain such additional matters;
    (9) Dismiss any person from the hearing who interferes with or obstructs the hearing or fails to abide by the rulings of the Chair of the Committee; and
    (10) Suspend summarily students from the University who, during the hearing, obstruct or interfere with the course of the hearing or persistently fail to abide by the ruling of the Chair of the Committee on any procedural question or request of the Chair for order.
  6. Communications. The Committee shall avoid communication with either Party or their advisers regarding the merits of a pending case prior to the hearing without the other Party or its adviser included. Communications for purposes of scheduling are permitted.
4. Rights of Accused Upon Hearing. A student or student organization appearing before a Committee shall have the right to:
  1. Be present at the hearing, which right may be waived by either written notification to the Chair or by failure to appear;
  2. Have an adviser (who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney) present during the hearing, who may actively participate and assist the student as described herein;
  3. To testify at the hearing or refuse to testify at the hearing;
  4. Hear or examine evidence presented to the Committee;
  5. Question witnesses present and testifying;
  6. Present evidence by witnesses or affidavit;
  7. Make any statement to the Committee in mitigation or explanation of the conduct in question;
  8. Request that the hearing be held virtually, with technology enabling participants simultaneously to see and hear each other;
  9. Be informed in writing of the findings of the Committee and any sanctions it imposes; and
  10. Request review or appeal to the Chancellor or Designee as herein provided.
5. Rights of the Primary Administrative Officer Upon Hearing. The Primary Administrative Officer appearing before a Committee shall have the right to:
  1. Be present at the hearing;
  2. Have an attorney from the Office of the General Counsel present as legal adviser to the Primary Administrative Officer, who may actively participate and assist the Primary Administrative Officer as described herein;
  3. To state any facts the investigation has revealed;
  4. Hear or examine evidence presented to the Committee;
  5. Question witnesses present and testifying;
  6. Present evidence by witnesses or affidavit;
  7. Request that the hearing be held virtually, with technology enabling participants simultaneously to see and hear each other;
  8. Be informed in writing of the findings of the Committee and any sanctions it imposes; and
  9. Request review or appeal to the Chancellor or Designee as herein provided.
6. Determination by the Student Conduct Committee. The Committee shall make its findings and determinations based on the preponderance of the evidence in executive session out of the presence of the Primary Administrative Officer and the accused student or student organization. Separate findings are to be made:
  1. As to the conduct of the accused student or student organization, and
  2. On the sanctions, if any, to be imposed. No sanctions shall be imposed on the accused student or student organization unless a majority of the Committee present is convinced by the preponderance of the evidence that the student or student organization has committed the violation charged. In determining what sanction, if any, is appropriate, the Committee may take into consideration the previous disciplinary history of the accused student or student organization.
7. Official Report of Findings and Determinations. The Committee shall promptly consider the case on the merits and make its findings and determination and transmit them to the Primary Administrative Officer/Designee(s) and the accused student or student organization designee. The Committee’s report shall detail the following:
  1. Identification of the allegations potentially constituting prohibited conduct and the determination of the Committee;
  2. A description of the procedural steps taken;
  3. Findings of fact supporting the determination and any information the Committee excluded from its consideration and why;
  4. Conclusions regarding the application of the University’s Standard of Conduct to the facts;
  5. A statement of, and rationale for, the result as to each allegation, including a determination regarding responsibility;
  6. Any disciplinary sanctions to be imposed on the student or student organization; and
  7. The procedures and permissible bases for the Parties to seek review or appeal.
8. Evidentiary and Procedural Questions. The relevancy and admissibility of any evidence offered and procedural questions shall be determined by the Chair, whose ruling shall be final unless the Chair shall present the question to the Committee at the request of a member of the Committee, in which event the ruling of the Committee by majority vote shall be final. In considering evidentiary and procedural questions, the Chair will apply the following rules:
  1. The Chair has the discretion to determine the relevance of any witness or documentary evidence and may exclude any witness, document, or information that is irrelevant, immaterial, cumulative, or more prejudicial than informative.
  2. The Committee shall consider the trustworthiness of all oral or written statements and no oral or written statement shall be considered if the source of the statement has not been disclosed to the Committee and the Parties.
  3. Character evidence is information that does not directly relate to the facts at issue, but instead reflects upon the reputation, personality, or qualities of an individual, including honesty. Such evidence regarding a Party’s character is of limited utility and shall not be admitted unless deemed relevant by the decision-maker.
  4. Incidents or behaviors of a Party not directly related to the possible violation(s) will not be considered unless they show a pattern of related misconduct. History of related misconduct by a Party that shows a pattern may be considered only if deemed relevant by the decision-maker.
  5. A student’s records that are made or maintained by a physician, psychiatrist, psychologist, or other recognized professional or paraprofessional acting in the professional’s or paraprofessional’s capacity, or assisting in that capacity, and which are made or maintained in connection with the provision of treatment to the student, may not be used without that student’s express consent.
  6. The Chair and Committee shall not require, allow, rely upon, or otherwise use questions or evidence that constitute, or seek disclosure of, information protected under a legally recognized privilege, unless the person holding such privilege has waived the privilege.
9. General Rules of Decorum. The following general rules of decorum shall be adhered to:
  1. All requests to address the Committee shall be addressed to the Chair.
  2. The Chair will rule on all requests and points of order and may consult with Committee’s legal adviser prior to any ruling. The Chair’s ruling shall be final and all participants shall abide thereby, unless the Chair shall present the question to the Committee at the request of a member of the Committee, in which event the ruling of the Committee by majority vote shall be final.
  3. The Chair or Committee may dismiss any person from the hearing who interferes with or obstructs the hearing or fails to abide by the rulings of the Chair or the Committee.
  4. Rules of common courtesy and decency shall be observed at all times.
10. Advisers / Attorneys. A student or student organization may have an adviser, who may be, but is not required to be, an attorney. Prior to the hearing, the adviser may communicate with the Chair on behalf of the student or student organization, including raising questions or objections or making requests regarding procedural matters.
  At the hearing, the adviser may ask any witnesses all relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those challenging credibility, and conduct cross- examination and other questioning. An adviser may request clarification of a procedural matter or object on the basis of procedure at any time by addressing the Chair after recognition. An adviser may make presentations and speak on behalf of their Party and may consult with the student or representatives of the student organization quietly or in writing, or outside the hearing during breaks.
11. Record of Hearing. An audio, video, digital or stenographic record of the hearing shall be maintained. The notice, exhibits, hearing record and the findings and determination of the Committee shall become the "Record of the Case" and shall be filed in the Office of the Primary Administrative Officer and for the purpose of review or appeal be accessible at reasonable times and places to the University, and the accused student(s) or student organization designee.
12. Transcripts. Information regarding expulsions will be noted on transcripts and shared system-wide. The Primary Administrative Officer will inform the Registrar or designee, who will make the transcript notation.

200.025 Equity Resolution Process for Resolving Complaints of Harassment

kuscheld — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:13:00 +0000

200.025 Equity Resolution Process for Resolving Complaints of Harassment kuscheld Mon, 09/22/2014 - 22:13

See Section 600.030 Equity Resolution Process for Resolving Complaints of Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct against a Student or Student Organization.

200.030 Forms for Use in Student Disciplinary Matters

kuscheld — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:14:00 +0000

200.030 Forms for Use in Student Disciplinary Matters kuscheld Mon, 09/22/2014 - 22:14

Amended Bd. Min. 3-20-81; Bd. Min. 5-24-01.

A. Acceptance of Discipline on Informal Disposition by Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

Date:

Misconduct:

(Specify particulars of misconduct in question.)

Proposed Discipline:

(Specify proposed disciplinary action or sanction.)

Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

The (Primary Administrative Officer/Designee) has informed me that for the misconduct stated he proposes to impose the discipline stated above against me and that I have ( ) days in which to make a decision to accept this proposal or to reject the proposal by signing the rejection, thereby invoking formal procedures. He/she has further explained to me if I neither accept nor reject the proposed discipline within the period of time stated above, (I will be deemed to have violated University regulations as charged, and) the proposed discipline shall become effective upon the expiration of that time.

I understand that I have a right to formal procedures prior to disposition if I reject the proposed discipline.

I accept (the determination, and) the proposed discipline stated above and waive my rights to formal procedures, review and appeal in this matter.

Student

Date:

I do not consent to the determination (the determination, and) the proposed discipline and invoke my rights to formal procedures.

Student

Date:

B. Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing

(Primary Administrative Officer/Designee)

(Date)

Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing

(Name of Student)

(Street Address)

(City and State)

Dear Mr./Ms. :

You are charged with violating on (insert date) at (insert place) the student standard of conduct as set forth in Section 200.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations of the University by failing to conduct yourself in a manner compatible with the University's functions as an educational institution in the following particulars:

(Insert particulars of student's alleged misconduct.)

Example 1:

That at the time and place above stated you did obstruct University teaching by blocking the door of room 202, Benton Hall, thereby preventing Dr. Smith from entering said room to teach the class in American History at that time.

Example 2:

That at the time and place above stated you failed to comply with the request of Dr. Jones, then in the process of teaching the class in Art History, to come to order or remove yourself from the classroom.

Example 3:

That at the time and place above stated you physically blocked and obstructed the doorway so that students seeking interviews with representatives of the Atomic Energy Commission could not enter said office free from your physical interference.

Example 4:

That at the time and place above stated you made an obscene and indecent gesture toward Dr. Baker and shouted the words, "___ you."

The Student Conduct Committee will hold a hearing on (day, date, time) and as continued from time to time in Room (number, name, building), ��ϲʹ�� (campus) to determine whether you committed the violation charged above and, if so, what, if any, discipline should be imposed.

A copy of the hearing and appeal procedures is enclosed for your convenience. They provide that you may have an adviser or counselor of your choice with you during the hearing and they also provide that in the event you request that students sit with the Student Conduct Committee in hearing your case you must request the appointment of students to the Committee at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the date set for the hearing by delivering such request in writing to me or the Chairman of the Student Conduct Committee before that time.

If you have any questions at all regarding this notice, the charges against you, or the procedures, please come in and see me.

Very truly yours,

Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

C. Request for Appointment of Students to Hearing Panel

(Date)

Chairman, Student Conduct Committee

c/o Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

(Address)

Dear Mr./Ms. Chairman:

Under the provisions of Section 200.020 of the Rules of Procedure in Student Disciplinary Matters, I request the appointment of students to serve with the Hearing Panel hearing my case on (date, time, place).

Very truly yours,

Student

Service of a copy of the above request acknowledged this day of , 20 , at o'clock.

Chairman or Primary Admin. Officer/Designee

D. Order and Notice of Appointment of Students to Hearing Panel

Student:

Charge:

Hearing: (Date, Time, Place)

Pursuant to Section 200.020 E.4 of the Rules of Procedure in Student Disciplinary Matters, and on request of the above named student, I hereby appoint the following students to serve on the Hearing Panel for the above captioned hearing:

The hearing will be held at _____, commencing at __ o'clock.

Chairman

Student Conduct Committee

E. Chairman's Agenda for Student Conduct Case Before Student Conduct Committee

Call to order.
Call role of committee in attendance.
State purpose of hearing, as follows:
"The following student, and would you please answer 'present' as your name is called for the record, (name of student) was charged on (date of notice) as follows: (Read Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing verbatim.)"
Verification and acknowledgement of receipt of Notice of Charges:
"I will now ask the student charged whether he has received the Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing dated , together with a copy of the hearing and appeal procedures."
(Insist on verbal response for the record.)
Establish presence of adviser or counselor:
"Mr./Ms., , do you have an adviser or counselor present?"
(Insist on verbal response for the record.)
"Would you please identify yourself for the record.)
Establish presence or absence of University Attorney for the record.
"There is also present, as legal adviser to the Committee, Attorney , University Counsel."
Disposition of procedural questions:
"The procedures as established by the Board of Curators for the conduct of this hearing will be followed unless there are any objections or suggestions to the contrary. Are there any objections or suggestions?"
Hearing:
1. Opening Statements:
  
  (1) Primary Administrative Officer./Designee "The Primary Administrative Officer/Designee shall now make opening remarks outlining the general nature of this case and testify to any facts his investigation has revealed."
  
  (2) Student: "Mr./Ms. (name of student), you may make a statement to the Committee about the charge at this time or at the conclusion of the University's presentation, at your election. Do you wish to make your statement now or wait until the conclusion of the University's case?"
  (Insist on verbal response.)
2. Presentation of University's evidence.
  
  (1) Call and identify University witnesses or permit introduction of written evidence, as appropriate.
  
  (2) Committee may question witnesses at any time during presentation.
  
  (3) Committee may question witnesses at conclusion of presentation.
  
  (4) The student or, with the Committee's permission, the student's adviser or counselor, may question witnesses or evidence at the conclusion of University's presentation.
3. Student's opening statement. If student has reserved right to make opening statement at this time he should be identified and permitted to make statement.
4. Student's evidence. Student may present evidence through witnesses or in form of written memoranda, as he desires. Committee may question witnesses or evidence at any time. The Primary Administrative Officer/Designee has right to question witness or evidence when student concludes his presentation.
5. Rebuttal evidence. Committee may permit University or student to offer witnesses or evidence in rebuttal to other's presentation at this time.
Executive Session: "The Committee will now go into executive session to consider this case."
Findings of fact and determination of discipline, if any. (Majority)
Preparation of written findings of facts and discipline imposed, if any.
Notification to student of findings in writing.

F. Disciplinary Findings and Determination

(Date)

DISCIPLINARY FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION

(Name of Student)

(Street Address)

(City and State)

Dear Mr./Ms. :

The Student Conduct Committee, following the presentation of evidence on the charges stated in the Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing dated , found that your conduct (did) (did not) constitute misconduct under Section 200.010 of the Collected Rules and Regulations of the University, in that you did (insert particulars set forth in Notice of Disciplinary Charges and Hearing.)"

The Committee determined that for the violations specified you be (insert discipline imposed).

I have enclosed a copy of the appeal or review procedure previously delivered to you for your convenience.

If you have any questions, please call me.

Very truly yours,

Chairman, Student Conduct Committee

G. Notice of Appeal and Petition to Attend Classes

To: Chancellor

Date:

I hereby appeal from the decision of the Student Conduct Committee dated on the following grounds and for the following reasons:

(Insert grounds or reasons for appeal.)

I further petition for permission to attend classes pending final determination of the appeal for the following reasons:

(Insert reasons.)

If permission to attend classes is granted, I agree to abide by the General Standard of Student Conduct and all rules and regulations of the University and any special provisions relating to the permission which may be improved.

Very truly yours,

Student's Name

Address, Telephone Number

A copy of this notice must be filed with the Chancellor and the Primary Administrative Officer/Designee within ten (10) consecutive calendar days of notification of the decision of the Student Conduct Committee.

H. Notice of Appeal by Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

To: Chancellor

Date:

I hereby appeal the decision of the Student Conduct Committee dated relating to (student's name and student number), on the following grounds and for the following reasons:

Very truly yours,

Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

Address, Telephone Number

A copy of this notice must be delivered to the Chancellor and sent to the student within ten (10) consecutive calendar days after notification of the decision of the Student Conduct Committee.

I. Petition for Review

To: Chancellor

Date:

I request that the decision of the Student Conduct Committee dated be reviewed for the following reasons and request an appointment to discuss this petition with you prior to your decision.

(Insert reasons.)

Respectfully submitted,

Student's Name

Address, Telephone Number

This notice must be filed with the Chancellor and a copy delivered to the Primary Administrative Officer/Designee within five (5) consecutive calendar days after notification of the decision of the Student Conduct Committee. The Primary Administrative Officer/Designee may answer the Petition for Review within five (5) consecutive calendar days and file a copy thereof with the Chancellor and send the student a copy.

J. Petition for Review by

To: Chancellor

DATE:

I request the decision of the Student Conduct Committee dated with reference to (student's name and student number) be reviewed for the following reasons:

(Insert reasons.)

Respectfully submitted,

Primary Administrative Officer/Designee

Address, Telephone Number

This notice must be filed with the Chancellor and a copy served to the student within five (5) consecutive calendar days after notification of the decision of the Student Conduct Committee. The student may answer the Petition for Review within five (5) consecutive calendar days and file a copy thereof with the Chancellor and send the Primary Administrative Officer/Designee a copy.

200.040 Student Participation in Intercollegiate Athletics

kuscheld — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 22:15:00 +0000

200.040 Student Participation in Intercollegiate Athletics kuscheld Mon, 09/22/2014 - 22:15

Bd. Min. 1-29-92, revised 10-28-93, revised 03-31-03.

The Board adopts the following rules to apply to intercollegiate athletes out of the belief that intercollegiate athletes should provide positive role models for aspiring high school athletes as well as other students and in all respects strive to reflect favorably on the University. Through the public attention generated by intercollegiate athletics, its participants represent the University. For these reasons, the Board holds the intercollegiate athlete to a standard of honorable conduct at all times while a member of any intercollegiate team, in season or out. The following Rules of Procedure and Discipline supplement the Rules of Procedure and Discipline found in the Student Code of Conduct that applies to all students in the ��ϲʹ�� System.
Any student who represents the ��ϲʹ�� by participation in intercollegiate athletics who is charged with a felony shall be suspended immediately from practice and from competition.
1. Within 48 hours of a suspension, the athlete's coach or designee and the Athletic Director shall review the suspension and recommend to the Chief Academic Officer or the Chief Student Affairs Officer, whichever has been designated by the Chancellor (hereinafter referred to as the Designated Officer), whether the suspension should continue. The Designated Officer's decision shall be made within 5 days after his or her receipt of such recommendation.
2. Upon request by the student, filed within 5 days of notice of the Designated Officer's decision that the suspension should continue, the student shall, within 5 days after making such request, be afforded an opportunity to present his or her position before the Athletic Director, the faculty representative to the regional and/or national athletic conference and association of which the campus is a member, and the Chairman of the campus Intercollegiate Athletic Committee. The aforementioned group shall, within 5 days after the student's presentation, make a recommendation to the Designated Officer as to whether the suspension should be continued, lifted or modified. The Designated Officer's decision shall be made within 5 days after his or her receipt of such recommendation.
3. Within 5 days after the decision by the Designated Officer, under Section 200.040B.2., that the suspension shall be continued, the student may appeal that decision, in writing, to the Chancellor whose decision shall be final, except as provided in Section 200.040B.4.
4. Based on available information, the Chancellor, in his or her sole discretion, may at any time prior to a finding of guilt or plea of guilty to the felony charge, lift or modify the suspension.
5. If the athlete pleads guilty or is found guilty of the felony charge, such athlete shall be barred permanently from participation in intercollegiate athletics at any campus of the ��ϲʹ�� System.
A student suspended from participation in intercollegiate athletics as a result of a felony charge shall not be prohibited from receiving financial aid during the pendency of such felony charge. Upon a plea of guilty to such felony charge, or a finding of guilt thereon, the University shall immediately determine, utilizing procedures consistent with applicable NCAA or other regulations, whether the student's aid shall continue.
The policy shall apply only for acts alleged to have been committed during the time such person is a student at the ��ϲʹ��.
The foregoing policy shall not be construed as a limitation on the ��ϲʹ��'s right to discipline such student pursuant to Student Code of Conduct procedures in addition to the consequences specified herein.
This policy shall be applicable to all renewals of current athletic aid commitments and to all subsequently awarded athletic financial aid.
This policy applies only to felonies alleged to have been committed after the date of its adoption.
The University is in no way pre-judging the situation by suspending the athlete from participation in intercollegiate athletics; rather, such action is prescribed in order to establish a positive standard by which the University, the Athletic Department and its scholar athletes might be judged by the public.

210.010 Guidelines for Educational Programs and Courses

kuscheld — Thu, 27 May 2010 17:01:37 +0000

210.010 Guidelines for Educational Programs and Courses kuscheld Thu, 05/27/2010 - 17:01

Executive Guideline No. 16, 6-18-79; Revised 11-1-84; Executive Guideline No. 16, 07-11-02

��ϲʹ�� programs are designed primarily to serve the citizens of this state. The University will offer on-site, out-of-state educational programs only when resources are provided from other than state-appropriated funds. The delivery of courses to students out-of-state using technology whereby the instructor remains in state is not considered on-site, out-of-state instruction (e.g., Internet courses, interactive television courses). Any exceptions require presidential approval prior to the delivery of the course or program.

210.020 Youth Protection Program

kuscheld — Thu, 15 Apr 2021 13:28:29 +0000

210.020 Youth Protection Program kuscheld Thu, 04/15/2021 - 13:28

Executive Order No. 48, 4-5-2021; Amended 7-20-2022.

Purpose
1. The universities of the ��ϲʹ�� System strive to offer a safe and enjoyable educational environment for all minors attending their programs. This policy sets forth the guiding principles and standards as well as outlining requirements for Youth Programs for children under the age of 18 (referred to herein as “minors” or “youth”.
Policy Statement
1. This policy establishes minimum standards for the protection of minors participating in Youth Programs held on university premises or operated by the university.
Definitions.
1. Youth Program Director – An individual aged 18 or older as the Program lead, the Designated Individual operating, supervising and responsible for overall operation and compliance of the program.
2. Designated Individual – Any adult, working or volunteering for a program or programs for minors, eighteen years of age or older, paid or unpaid, who supervises or has responsibilities for oversight of minors and/or Youth Leaders or Youth Programs without a parent, legal guardian or school chaperone present throughout. Examples include faculty, staff, student, student employees, appointees and volunteers.
3. Youth Leader – Any person under the age of eighteen years who assists with the Youth Program and must be supervised by an adult who has met the policy requirements.
4. Background check – A required National screening of a Designated Individual’s criminal history performed by the university’s approved vendor or a criminal history screening specifically approved by the Youth Program Representative; a background check shall also include a check of the U. S Department of Justice (Dru Sjodin) national sex offender registry as well as the Missouri sex offender registry, or, if applicable, the sex offender registry of the state of residence of the Designated Individual.
5. Youth Program Guide – The procedures defined and published by the Youth Protection Program.
6. Parent – Parent or legal guardian of a minor.
7. Retaliation – Any adverse action taken against a person because of that person’s participation in protected activity, and includes any adverse action taken against a person for making a good faith report or for testifying, assisting, or participating in any investigation or proceeding involving allegations of violations of this policy.
8. Supervision - Each program must establish a plan for adequate supervision considering the number and average age of participants, the program activity, and whether overnight accommodations are involved.
9. Youth/Child/Minor – A person under the age of eighteen who is not enrolled or accepted for enrollment as a student at the University.
10. Youth program – An academic, athletic or recreational activity or program offered to a minor by the University, or by a non-university group using University facilities, or in partnership during which youth are the primary audience. Refer to the policy for detail.
11. Youth Program Representative – The point of contact at the University designated by Ethics, Compliance and Audit Services as the individual responsible for ensuring implementation, execution and monitoring of this policy.
Scope
1. This policy applies to any Youth Program as defined by this policy.
2. Programs included are those offered for minors in person or virtually by all schools and departments of the university, student groups, partnerships and by non-university groups on university-owned property or using university facilities.
3. This includes but is not limited to:
  1. Camps, activities and programs offered by the University
  2. Workshops, group lessons, conferences, seminars, camps, internship or observer placements, experiential learning opportunities and other enrichment programs
  3. Programs with alternatively approved processes that meet or exceed our requirements
  4. Non-university groups using University facilities
Exemptions
1. While the University is committed to the welfare and appropriate treatment of all minors, the Youth Program requirements of the Policy are addressed elsewhere for the following:
  1. Individuals who are enrolled or accepted for enrollment at the university
  2. Performance or events open to the general public
  3. School/organization activities accompanied throughout by adult chaperones from their school/organization/parent
  4. Minors that are employed by the university (See HR-116)
Exceptions
1. The Youth Program Representative may approve limited exceptions to the requirements of this policy, provided that adequate alternative measures are in place.
2. Large, Occasional Events: Programs that are occasional events for which a large number of volunteers are essential, may request to adopt measures and safeguards other than background check for the one-time volunteers (for example: Show-Me Games). Program wishing to adopt alternative measures must make their request to and obtain the approval of the Youth Program Representative in advance of the program. The alternative measures adopted must meet minimum standards as outlined by the Youth Program Guide.
Requirements
1. University Program
  1. Programs designated as Youth Programs must comply with this policy and procedures outlined by the Youth Program Guide as well as any other applicable requirement of federal, state, local law or regulation and other University policies.
  2. A program will not allow participation of any Designated Individual whose national background check and/or U. S Department of Justice (Dru Sjodin) National Sex Offender Registry check includes sexually based offenses or offenses against children or as stated Criminal History Review Criteria by the Child Protection Improvements Act. Records of other offenses or substantiated reports of child abuse or neglect will be considered on a case-by-case basis by the program, in consultation with the appropriate offices (e.g., Human Resources, Academic Affairs, Student Affairs, Athletics, Office of Risk Management, Title IX & Equity Office, and/or Office of General Counsel) as needed, to determine if the individual’s record will preclude participation.
  3. Register each activity in advance. Registration for ongoing and pre-established programs must be completed annually.
  4. All Designated Individuals must complete the requirements as outlined below.,
  5. Provide parents/guardians of participants with required forms.
  6. Follow the established Standards of Conduct.
  7. Adhere to all reporting obligations.
  8. In the event of a medical emergency, authorized adults should contact local emergency medical services.
  9. The University reserves the right to condition, restrict, or deny access to university facilities by minors at its discretion. All minors, including those participating in a campus program for minors will be subject to all University regulations while on campus, and may be asked to leave the campus if unable to comply.
2. Designated Individual(s)
  1. Any adult who will serve a Youth Program and completes the requirements which include:
    
    1. A national criminal background check conducted and successfully cleared and U. S Department of Justice (Dru Sjodin) Sex Offender Registry Check within the prior 12 months before participating for the first time in any activity or program, thereafter, every 3 years. Individual programs may require more frequent checks.
    2. Motor Vehicle Record (MVR) check, if while in their capacity as a Designated Individual, they will be providing transportation.
  2. Successfully complete annual training course.
  3. Follow appropriate safety measures by the Office of Environmental Health & Safety.
  4. Follow the established Standards of Conduct as published in the Youth Program Guide.
  5. Adhere to all reporting obligations.
  6. Complete a volunteer assignment form, if applicable by program or campus.
3. Non-University Programs
  1. As a non-university organization, in most cases, you are required to register your program, complete a Facility User Agreement including the Protection of Minors Addendum notifying you of the policy requirements and your responsibility to operate consistent with the policy. The university reserves the right to require proof of compliance with the requirements, which include but are not limited to:
    
    1. Responsibility for completing background and DOJ sex offender registry check within the prior 3 years at least 30 days prior to the program on all Designated Individuals.
    2. Provide training to all adults who will supervise minors.
    3. Be aware of how to report any incident/concerns as required by law.
    4. Structure the program to eliminate any one-on-one time between an adult and a minor in a private area not readily observable by others.
  2. Disclaimer: The following statement should be included in all program related brochures, websites, advertising materials, etc.: ("Program Name) is solely operated by (Legal Name of Entity), which is not affiliated with ��ϲʹ��."
  3. Programs that fail to comply with the Youth Protection Policy and these policy requirements may be subject to suspension or termination of operations.
4. Authority
  1. The President has delegated the authority to the Chief Audit & Compliance Officer for oversight of the Protection of Minors Program.
  2. Ethics, Compliance and Audit Services will designate a Youth Program Representative responsible for ensuring management of this policy.
5. Sanctions
  1. Failure to comply with the requirements set forth in this policy may lead to immediate cancellation of the program, disciplinary action, and/or revocation of the opportunity to use university facilities. Actions may include but are not limited to:
    
    1. Programs in violation of this policy may be denied permission to continue operation.
    2. Any violations of university policies by an individual will be dealt with in accordance with applicable University policy and procedures, which may include disciplinary actions up to and including termination of employment or expulsion from the University. Prohibitions regarding physical presence on campus/trespassing may also be pursued.
    3. Law enforcement may be contacted if a crime is suspected. Conduct that violates local, state, federal, or otherwise applicable laws, statutes, regulations, codes, or ordinances, domestically or internationally, may be punishable under those laws.
6. Retaliation.
  1. The University strictly prohibits retaliation and threats of retaliation. Any person who engages in such retaliation shall be dealt with in accordance with applicable University policies and procedures, which may include disciplinary actions up to and including termination of employment or expulsion from the University.

210.030 Reserve Officer Training Corps

kuscheld — Thu, 27 May 2010 17:03:03 +0000

210.030 Reserve Officer Training Corps kuscheld Thu, 05/27/2010 - 17:03

Bd. Min. 2-10-56, p. 8,757; Bd. Min. 12-12-64, p. 26,064; Bd. Min. 6-27-69, p. 34,656; Amended Bd. Min. 4-27-79.

Voluntary -- Effective September 1, 1965, enrollment of students in ROTC programs at the University will be on a voluntary basis.
1. The ��ϲʹ�� is interested in and will maintain to the best of its ability strong and viable ROTC programs at all times.
Policy Statement
1. Society depends on its institutions of higher education to furnish educated leadership in a wide variety of roles and occupations. These include professionally-trained individuals for service in government at all levels, local, state, and national. Only in the area of education for careers in the Armed Services has the Federal government established its own institutions for the education of a portion of the officers required for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. However, despite the existence of the U.S. Military, Naval, and Air Force Academies, civilian colleges and universities have historically and do presently provide the substantial majority of officers for the regular and reserve forces.
2. Recently the desirability of civilian educational institutions being involved in the education of those who may serve as officers in the Armed Services, on a temporary or career basis, has been subject to criticism and attack. It is charged that this involvement contributes to the "militarization" of our society. We believe that the opposite is true. The continued presence in substantial numbers in the Armed Forces of officers from a wide variety of civilian educational institutions and backgrounds is, in fact, one of the best guarantees against the establishment in this country of a "military" caste or clique or establishment. It is no more desirable or appropriate for the education of future officers to be nationalized, or cast in a single mold, than for this to occur with respect to future leaders in any other professional or occupational field.
3. The program of education of officers, like any other educational program, is and needs to be constantly under study and revision. Variety and flexibility of approach, within a basic framework of common objectives, is desirable and to be encouraged, as in any other profession. The basic issue, however, should not be obscured in the process of legitimate debate and discussion of questions of curriculum content, of who may appropriately offer instruction for credit, of the amount of credit to be given in a particular curriculum in a particular institution, etc.
4. The basic issue, as this committee sees it, is whether or not it is appropriate for state universities and land grant colleges, which have traditionally taken leadership in offering opportunities for both professional and general education for those entering the various "pursuits and professions of life" in our country, to include among them opportunities for those who wish to prepare themselves for service in the Armed Forces. We believe it is most appropriate.
ROTC Awards -- In addition to the present Curators' awards for students enrolled in ROTC, the following are established, the cost of materials to be provided from Expense and Equipment funds of the department concerned.
1. One additional medal, making a total of two, to the outstanding cadets of the preceding Army ROTC Summer Camp. This is needed because of the much larger size of the Advanced Course in Army ROTC over that in the other departments.
2. A medal to the outstanding cadet in the freshman course in Army, Air Force, and Naval ROTC.
3. A medal to the outstanding cadet in the junior course in Army, Air Force, and Naval ROTC.
4. ROTC Departments may issue Certificates of Merit to cadets outstanding in academic achievement, conduct and character. Such certificates shall be on the standard form employed, shall bear the name of the President of the University and the Secretary of the Board of Curators and shall be signed by the PMS & T, the PAS, or the PNS, as the case may be. Certificates shall be furnished by the Director of Admissions.
5. The Curators Cup for the best drilled unit in Army, Air Force, or Naval ROTC may, in the discretion of the Department, be presented to several units during the same year.
6. That the Board of Curators Marksmanship Medals be awarded annually to each ROTC program using the following criteria:
  1. A gold medal to the member of each ROTC program's Rifle Team having the highest average scores in official marksmanship competition during the current year.
  2. A silver medal to the member of each ROTC program's Rifle Team having the second highest average score.
  3. A bronze medal to the member of each ROTC program's Rifle Team having the third highest average score.

210.040 Intercampus Transfer

kuscheld — Thu, 27 May 2010 17:05:38 +0000

210.040 Intercampus Transfer kuscheld Thu, 05/27/2010 - 17:05

Bd. Min. 10-12-73, p. 36,837.

Any course that leads to an undergraduate degree on any campus of the ��ϲʹ�� shall be accepted in transfer toward the same degree on each campus of the University offering said degree. Grades and honor points earned in such courses shall also transfer, and shall be included in the accumulative point averages of the transferring students.
Each campus shall identify in its catalogue an office on the campus which will furnish to students necessary information about degree and major requirements in force at other campuses of the ��ϲʹ��.
A student who begins his work at a campus of the ��ϲʹ��, then enrolls in and attempts twelve or more hours at an institution outside the ��ϲʹ��, and then returns to a campus of the ��ϲʹ�� shall be treated as any other transfer student from a campus outside the ��ϲʹ��.
There shall be a faculty transfer-review board (with faculty, student, and administrative members) established on each campus by the appropriate faculty governing body to hear student appeals for relieve from admissions decisions on transfer of credits, grades, and honor points; to recommend relief if deemed appropriate; and to assist in the evenhanded application of the philosophy underlying the above policies.